Politics

The final session at Social Media & Society 2018 today is one I’m moderating, and starts with a paper by Ivan Kalmar, Nicholas Worby who explores the connections between Islamophobia and antisemitism in extremist online communication. Islamophobic politicians go to great lengths to claim that they are not antisemitic, in order not to be painted as fascists, yet give enough hints to their followers to still be seen as anti-Jewish.

The next speaker in this ICA 2018 session is Chenjerai Kumanyika, who notes his growing scepticism about the effectiveness of visual protest media. We must pay more attention to the changes that are occurring at this time, and to what new interventions still work.

The next speaker at ICA 2018 is Sarah Banet-Weiser, who begins by highlighting the popular Trump masks now available for purchase. What does it mean to see through Trump in such a way – more generally, what is the authenticity of Trump’s persona?

The next speaker in this very fast-paced ICA 2018 session is Jayson Harsin, whose interest is in the emergence of post-truth or emo-truth in the context of the Trump Presidency. Post-truth appeals to emotion and personal belief rather than facts; this is a periodising term that refers to a widespread culture of distrust in an era of channel fragmentation and the emergence of micro-truthtellers who dine out on such emotional appeals.

The next speaker in this ICA 2018 session is Jack Bratich, who introduces the concept of necro-populism as a description of the Trump Presidency. Hardcore Trump supporters present a particular form of fan culture: they engage in adolescent military play-acting, and can be described as fanboys of tyranny engaging in a form of militant cosplay.

Up next in this ICA 2018 session is Roopali Mukherjee, who begins by noting the #TrumpArtworks campaign that repurposed famous art by placing Trump in the scene. Such alterations focussed especially on Trump’s counterfactual boasts about the size of his inauguration crowd, and were part of a larger social and mainstream media storm that sought to fact-check and correct the President’s obviously incorrect claims.

The next session I’m seeing at ICA 2018 is on the U.S. national trauma that is the Trump Presidency. We start with Laurie Ouellette, and she begins with the (fake) story of Trump signing on to a reality TV show based around the Trump White House. This actually confused some readers given that the premise of the show seemed uncannily familiar; reality TV or not, the Trump Presidency is a media spectacle whose political logics cannot be fully separated from those of reality TV and social media.

The next speaker in this session at ICA 2018 is Marco Toledo Bastos, whose interest is in the presence of echo chambers in the debate leading up to the Brexit vote. Echo chambers, especially on social media, have been blamed for the unexpected results of that referendum and a variety of other elections, but recent research has also challenged such perspectives.

The next paper in this ICA 2018 session is Dam Hee Kim, whose focus is on what effects exposure to diverse political viewpoints has on partisan views. Such exposure has always been seen as important for a healthy democracy, but this poses two major challenges: audiences do not necessarily actively seek out diverse viewpoints, and such diverse exposure does not necessarily bring about the democratic benefits that theory would expect.

The first ICA 2018 session I’m seeing this Monday morning is on echo chambers, and starts with Kelley Cotter and Mel Medeiros, who outlines the processes by which social media platforms generate algorithmic identities for their users. These identities determine what kind of content users encounter in their (algorithmically curated) newsfeed.